I’ve made fun of economists in this space before, but they’re not all idiots. In fact, there are some running around out there who are pretty smart, and who care passionately about building an economy that works for everyone.
So who are these economists? You can meet a bunch of them by checking out this full-page ad from the Economic Policy Institute that ran in today’s Washington Post, in which 39 of America’s most prominent economists — including Nobel laureates Kenneth Arrow and Robert M. Solow and progressive blog heroes Dean Baker and Brad DeLong — explain to Congress why passing the Employee Free Choice Act is a key step towards economic recovery:
Although its collapse has dominated recent media coverage, the financial sector is not the only segment of the U.S. economy running into serious trouble. The institutions that govern the labor market have also failed, producing the unusual and unhealthy situation in which hourly compensation for American workers has stagnated even as their productivity soared.
Indeed, from 2000 to 2007, the income of the median working-age household fell by $2,000 - an unprecedented decline. In that time, virtually all of the nation’s economic growth went to a small number of wealthy Americans. An important reason for the shift from broadly-shared prosperity to growing inequality is the erosion of workers’ ability to form unions and bargain collectively.
A natural response of workers unable to improve their economic situation is to form unions to negotiate a fair share of the economy, and that desire is borne out by recent surveys. Millions of American workers - more than half of non-managers - have said they want a union at their work place. Yet only 7.5% of private sector workers are now represented by a union. And in all of 2007, fewer than 60,000 workers won union status through government-sanctioned elections. What explains this disconnect?
The problem is that the election process overseen by the National Labor Relations Board has become drawn out and acrimonious, with management campaigning fiercely to deter unionization, sometimes to the extent of violating labor laws. Union sympathizers are routinely threatened or even fired, and they have little effective recourse under the law. Even when workers overcome this pressure and vote for a union, they are unable to obtain contracts one-third of the time due to management resistance.
To remedy this situation, the Congress is considering the Employee Free Choice Act. This act would accomplish three things: It would give workers the choice of using majority sign-up— a simple, established procedure in which workers sign cards to indicate their support for a union - or staging an NLRB election; it triples damages for employers who fire union supporters or break other labor laws; and it creates a process to ensure that newly unionized employees have a fair shot at obtaining a first contract by calling for arbitration after 120 days of unsuccessful bargaining.
The Employee Free Choice Act will better reflect worker desires than the current “war over representation.” The Act will also lower the level of acrimony and distrust that often accompanies union elections in our current system.
A rising tide lifts all boats only when labor and management bargain on relatively equal terms. In recent decades, most bargaining power has resided with management. The current recession will further weaken the ability of workers to bargain individually. More than ever, workers will need to act together.
The Employee Free Choice Act is not a panacea, but it would restore some balance to our labor markets. As economists, we believe this is a critically important step in rebuilding our economy and strengthening our democracy by enhancing the voice of working people in the workplace.
The complete list of signers:
- Henry J. Aaron, Brookings Institution
- Katharine Abraham, University of Maryland
- Philippe Aghion, Harvard University
- Eileen Appelbaum, Rutgers University
- Kenneth Arrow, Nobel Laureate in Economics, Stanford University
- Dean Baker, Center for Economic Policy and Research
- Jagdish Bhagwati, Columbia University
- Rebecca Blank, Brookings Institution
- Joseph Blasi, Rutgers University
- Alan S. Blinder, Princeton University
- William A. Darity, Duke University
- Brad DeLong, University of Calif. - Berkeley
- John DiNardo, University of Michigan
- Robert H. Frank, Cornell University
- Richard Freeman, Harvard University
- James K. Galbraith, University of Texas
- Robert J. Gordon, Northwestern University
- Heidi Hartmann, Institute for Women’s Policy Research
- Lawrence Katz, Harvard University
- Robert Lawrence, Harvard University
- David S. Lee, Princeton University
- Frank Levy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Lisa Lynch, Brandeis University
- Ray Marshall, University of Texas
- Lawrence Mishel, Economic Policy Institute
- Robert Pollin, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
- William Rodgers, Rutgers University
- Dani Rodrik, Harvard University
- Jeffrey D. Sachs, Columbia University
- Robert M. Solow, Nobel Laureate in Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- William Spriggs, Howard University
- Peter Temin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Mark Thoma, University of Oregon
- Lester C. Thurow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Laura Tyson, University of Calif.- Berkeley
- Paula B. Voos, Rutgers University
- David Weil, Boston University
- Edward Wolff, New York University
(Bios for all signers are available here.)
Want to stand with them in support of the Employee Free Choice Act? Sign our online petition today!


Comments (1)
Comments posted to CtW Connect are the sole property of the individual posting them, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Change to Win, its affiliated unions, or its leadership.
You guys are all brainwashed.
If you had any intelligence,you would look outside your little box and see that the management of unions are nothing more than a middle men stealing money from little mind numbed people that have fallen into the trap the unions have built.
Unions are destroying this country as has been demonstrated with the auto companies and many other companies that cannot afford to stay in business. While some on the reasons these businesses have failed is not due only to the union responsibility, the unions are the primary culprit in the destruction of these businesses.
You promote animosity in the workplace, you bring moral down, you suck the desire from humans to be independent. Just look at your workforce and how they live and socialize in the communities. It is a shame what you are doing to these people and their families and their future generations. Unions were started for the reason of helping people. Unions have exploded into nothing more than money pit taking money from the members, speding on management and handing it over to politician as a bribe to help them continue their immoral ways.
Posted by Chris on February 28, 2009 at 8:09 AM
Posted on February 28, 2009 at 8:09 AM