« Unemployment Continues to Rise | Main | Raiding the Cookie Jar »

What Wal-Mart Is Afraid Of: You

There’s a great story in today’s Wall Street Journal describing how Wal-Mart, terrified of how a President Obama might make it easier for workers to join together in unions, is pressuring its employees to vote for John McCain:

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is mobilizing its store managers and department supervisors around the country to warn that if Democrats win power in November, they’ll likely change federal law to make it easier for workers to unionize companies — including Wal-Mart.

In recent weeks, thousands of Wal-Mart store managers and department heads have been summoned to mandatory meetings at which the retailer stresses the downside for workers if stores were to be unionized…

“The meeting leader said, ‘I am not telling you how to vote, but if the Democrats win, this bill will pass and you won’t have a vote on whether you want a union,’” said a Wal-Mart customer-service supervisor from Missouri. “I am not a stupid person. They were telling me how to vote,” she said.

What is striking such fear into the heart of Bentonville? It’s the Employee Free Choice Act — a bill that would take away Wal-Mart’s freedom to bully and threaten its workers at will to keep them from joining together. It would give those workers the power to join together if they want to without fearing retaliation from the company. Clearly, that’s a prospect that Wal-Mart’s management is uncomfortable with.

And they’re not the only ones. As I write this, big business is mobilizing an enormous campaign with one and only one purpose: to defeat the Employee Free Choice Act. How serious are they? They are ready to spend $100 million to make this happen.

Why? Because it would give workers the power to control their own destinies. That’s a prospect that they believe simply cannot be permitted. And they’re willing to spend whatever it takes — and do whatever it takes, even if that brings them to the very edge of the law — to keep that power out of your hands.

At the most basic level, that’s what Wal-Mart is so terrified of: you.

They’re terrified that if you have the power to decide your own fate — to reverse decades of inequality and start bringing the benefits of your productivity home to your own family, rather than having it go to send some Wal-Mart executive’s kid to boarding school — you’ll use it. And that would put an end to an era that has been extraordinarily profitable for those fortunate few at the top.

So they’re going to come out swinging. They’re going to do everything they can to keep that power out of your hands. They’re going to tell our leaders that you can’t be trusted with it. They’re going to tell our media that you aren’t smart enough to use it wisely. They’re going to tell you that power is complicated and scary and that you’d be better off trusting them to do the right thing by you.

They’re going to say whatever they have to say to keep you from having the power to stand up for your rights.

Because the Employee Free Choice Act would put the power to decide your future where it belongs: in your hands.

Postscript: There’s some great discussion going on around the Web about this today. Here’s a few links:

Union organizers have no effective legal recourse to violations of labor law and employers have no incentive to actually follow the law. And since employees know the laws won’t be enforced if broken, employers only relatively rarely need to actually break the law in order to get the correct intimidating threat. Like the mafia, a company like Wal-Mart only needs to be seen to break a few kneecaps and get away with it for there to be an adequate intimidation effect to de facto deny a vast workforce its rights.

It’s impossible to organize under circumstances where labor-friendly workers are fired, stores are closed to serve as an example to others, and where companies pay trivial fines eight years after the fact. Card check, by contrast, makes it possible to organize. And Wal-Mart is, predictably, terrified. But not because their workers wouldn’t “have a vote.” Rather, they’re afraid because, finally, they would.

While Lee Scott and the Waltons live in huge mansions and travel with bodyguards, paid for by the labor of their employees, these folks have the audacity to “fear” their employees into voting AGAINST their own pocketbook.

This is the same company that encourages its underpaid workers to seek out gov’t assistance.

This company is as tolitarian as any country could be.

Just when you think Wal-Mart is getting a little better, you realize it’s the same old union-busting firm it always was.

Seen any other good write-ups? Share them in the comments!

This web page is paid for by the Change to Win Committee for the American Dream and is not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Comments (7)

Comments posted to CtW Connect are the sole property of the individual posting them, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Change to Win, its affiliated unions, or its leadership.

William Rist said on August 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM:

Big government,Big Wal-Mart,Federal Reserve, IRS,
are frauds in the U.S., I would encourage these pagan thieves, to dissolve in to hiding places.I would encourage people to study the "Constitution," and pay close attention to the First and Second Amendment. Don't let these
pagan organizations use their worthless "Fear"
tactics.

nom deplume said on August 4, 2008 at 1:09 PM:

For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. Economics is not physics, but there are parallels.

In a (relatively) free market, leftist attempts to grab the means of production, whether through taxation, regulation, or appropriation, cause capital flight.

Unions are an attempt to control a commodity (labor). If any other industry did this, it would be cause for criminal charges. But in order for unionism to work, you need total control. Any free market mechanism erodes union strength--If wal-mart is union and Target isn't, and Target can charge less, that is where most folks will shop. Wal-mart makes less and lays off. Nice organized union folks are thus unemployed.

What irks me is not that you would essentially vote yourselves out of a job, but then you would cry to your congressman to tax me in order to support you.

Nom Deplume, J.D., LL.M.

OMFG,

First off, who the hell is William Rist? As a member of a pagan faith, WTF is your problem?

Next up, "nom Deplume" look, rick berman (note how I didn't capitalize that), take your head out of that very dark place and stop quote right wing talking points about "free markets" which are not "free". The only country to go hog wild on the "free" market concept screwed itself royally back in the 1800's, um that was England. The premise being if they dropped all those pesky protections it would open other markets. Fascinating stuff, but really made Gladestone and Disraeli pivotal actors on that stage.

Markets must be controlled and corporations are not citizens and hold no common allegiance to any one country (ie., Levis produced outside the US, Anheiser Bush owned by Belgian company, and yeah we could go on and on).

Workers have the right to organize. There should be work for all (see the Johnny Clegg and Juluka Song Work For All). Together we have power. We have the power to demand justrice and hold others accountable for it. Together we have the power to win elections. Together we have the ability to make any country the most powerful country in the World, and we've done it. But we did it together. It's called solidarity. Perhaps you should look it up.

William Rist said on August 9, 2008 at 12:37 AM:

William Rist, is a Gulf War veteran, who served this country, what about you? Bendygirld, seems to hate the veterans of this country.

Angela said on August 13, 2008 at 8:53 PM:

Why do you think she hates veterans? Because she doesn't know who you are? I'm a military veteran myself. So what? And you didn't serve your country. You served the Old Bush and tried to overthrow the legitimate government of another country. I don't see how this personally serves me since I qualify as part of the country.

William Rist said on August 14, 2008 at 12:14 AM:

Exactly the point, she is cursing at someone she doesn't even know. If you were a veteran yourself,
then why are you attacking those veterans who served under Bush? So, then do you believe that no one should have served this country under Bush?
I guess it would be every person for theirself.
Perhaps, this country should continue to put its head in the sand, and stay quiet about what is really wrong. It is fear tactics that will enslave the people of this country. What country,
millions of illegals, with a diminishment of boarders, leading to a "One World Government. The
word Free Speech will lead to duct tape. What defines a person of this country, when the boarders have been left unsecure since the 2001 attacks? Ask people who believe that we should keep the troops in the Middle East,and you will find that these are the very same ones who would not be willing to relieve these soldiers, who have been doing three tours in a row.
My hats off to the veterans who served this country. You qualify as part of this country,and so do alot of illegals, identity theft will be on the rise, because of the progressing National ID card. I suppose, you are in favor of the IRS and Federal Reserve as well. Private bankers are controlling the world not citizens.

Debating unions w/ Conservatives is a waste of time. Walmart apparently broke the law and we need to demand they are investigated.
Thanks for taking action, Change to Win.