Michael Moore's movie "Sicko" made the point that it was not focusing on the uninsured, but on those "who have insurance." It showed how working people "who have health care coverage" have, in fact, woefully inadequate insurance that can still leave them impoverished or dead in cases where a real national health care plan would not.
But a new trend to so-called "limited benefit" health plans indicates that the situation will get much worse than "Sicko" portrays it over the coming years if a true break with the profit-based health care system does not take place.
The following is becoming increasingly common. A worker is rushed to the hospital with a heart attack that prompts emergency surgery. After a four-day stay, the worker is released and presented with a bill for $48,000. He discovers that his insurance covers only $2,000 of the total; he owes the rest.
This scenario is playing out across the country as more workers are forced into "limited benefit" health plans that employers and insurance companies are pushing on low-wage nonunion workers in the service industries.
More than a million workers have already been shoved into these plans, including workers at Sears, Home Depot, McDonald's, Wal-Mart, Target and Friendly's. At Lowe's, about 7,000 part-time employees are enrolled in limited benefit plans capped at $2,500 or $5,000 a year. Cigna estimates that the number of people covered under these plans is growing by 15 percent a year.
Cigna, Aetna and other insurance companies are promoting these plans to squeeze money out of workers at companies that have dumped their traditional health plans, raised the workers' share of premiums so high that workers can't afford to participate, or refused to cover all of their workers.
Under these "limited benefit" or "mini-med" plans, workers pay the entire premium cost, usually a premium of $50 to $100 a month. The catch is that these plans cap coverage at amounts as low as $1,000. They provide yet another vehicle for the insurance companies to get rich off the plight of the working poor. Many workers are unaware of the caps when they sign up for the plans.
With these plans, employers can pretend that they are providing health benefits, insurers can pretend that they are covering medical costs, and state legislatures can pretend that the number of uninsured Americans is falling. Cigna tells employers that the plans are "designed for part-time and hourly employees" and "will improve your company image" and "reduce turnover, absenteeism and fraudulent worker's compensation claims."
This trend toward pretend health benefits follows the same pattern that we have already seen with retirement benefits, where employers replace real pensions with pretend "pensions" - 401(k) accounts that shift all the risk to workers. Now employers have joined with the health insurers to create pretend health benefits - insurance policies paid for by workers with almost no benefits.
As long as profit-making insurance companies control the U.S. health care system, employers will find willing partners in their efforts to force costs onto workers. A national health care plan that puts quality affordable health care first and profits last is the only solution.
Greg Tarpinian is the Executive Director of Change to Win.

Comments (3)
Comments posted to CtW Connect are the sole property of the individual posting them, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Change to Win, its affiliated unions, or its leadership.
Not only is healthcare an important issue but so is personal time or the ability to take time off without loosing your job. I was an employee with Amazon.com in one of thier warehouses in Nevada. I was going through a health issue (being treated for stage 1 breast cancer) and because the time off was intermitent and not in a lump they refused to grant me FMLA. Normally that would not have been an issue because we would have recieved our yearly alotment of personal time on April 1st, but on March 25th they made an annoucement that as a company they were changing our personal time policy and only giving us 10 hours (one days shift) to us on April 1st and all other time had to be accrued at 1.5 hours per week. Amazon uses a point system so once you have used up your personal time they start pointing you.... 1/2 point for late arrival, 1 point for leaving early, 1.5 for calling in sick... etc. Once you get to 6 points you are termed. I used up my personal time within a week (2 DR appointments on the same day) and they refused the intermintent FMLA requeast and so I started to recieve points. I was termed by the end of May because the refused to try and work with me and then once they termed me they tried to fight my unemployment by saying that I was unable to work because of the cancer. I have since had to sell my car to afford my cobra payments but I have had my surgery and am completely able to work. If they hadn't been difficult with me I would have had this all taken care of by mid June insted of just finally having the surgery yesterday. They have forced me to live below the poverty level (I am a single mom with two small boys) and threatened my health by not providing me with proper FMLA or insurance. I want others to know of their treatment of employees because I am not the only person that they have done this type of thing to.
Posted by Kerri Miller on July 31, 2007 at 1:38 PM
Posted on July 31, 2007 at 1:38 PM
thanks for the info on your plight. American's hearts go out to you for what is being done to you. May you be in good health.
I have told many people about this and we have pledged to NEVER buy from amazon again.
Posted by brian on August 7, 2007 at 4:24 PM
Posted on August 7, 2007 at 4:24 PM
Greg,
Fine job on giving the members the truth about these bogus health plans. Prior to my retirement this was one of the hottest issues in negotiations of manufacturing contracts.We advised our members that these plans would be detrimental to them and their families, and we prevailed.These facts just reaffirm our reccomendations.
Posted by Retired Local St on August 7, 2007 at 5:22 PM
Posted on August 7, 2007 at 5:22 PM